We're just back in town, with lots of catchup work to do. But with Wisconsin's Recall Elections tomorrow, here are some important actions that folks (of any party!) who care about accurate election results can do to help protect the election results.
Remember, WI mostly votes on paper ballots. Unfortunately, however, most of those paper ballots are tabulated in secret inside of computers systems similar or identical to ones which have failed time again elsewhere, as seen most recently in places like Palm Beach County, FL and New York City. In WI, there is no mandated manual examination of paper ballots after the computer tabulates them in order to make sure they were tabulated accurately. That's a very bad (and dangerous) system.
In Palm Beach, several candidates incorrectly declared to be the "winners" by the Sequoia Voting Systems optical-scan tabulation computers in a March election this year had, in fact, been the losers of their races. The failure was discovered during a manual post-election spot-check of a tiny percentage of the paper ballots. WI does no such post-election spot-check of ballots to test the accuracy of their computer systems. Only a full hand-count of all the paper ballots in the Palm Beach elections revealed the correct winners. The identical tabulation system are used in WI's very Republican-leaning Waukesha County, as well as elsewhere in the state.
In New York City, it took nearly two years, but finally last month, ES&S, the company which manufacturers the paper-ballot optical scanners now used there, admitted that it was a flaw in their scanners which led to thousands of votes going uncounted during the 2010 elections. The company admitted to the system failure after the New York Daily News confirmed an error rate of 70% during the primary election and 54% in the general election in just one precinct in the South Bronx after a public records request and hand-count of the paper ballots. Those same flawed systems, the ES&S model DS200 paper-ballot op-scan system, are used in much of Lincoln, Portage and Wood Counties in WI.
There are many other systems used across the Badger State which have similarly failed in election after election. As always, "Democracy's Gold Standard" is a full public hand-count of ballots by actual human beings on election night, at the precinct, in front of all parties and video cameras, with results posted right there before ballots are moved anywhere. Unfortunately, that is rarely, if ever, done in Wisconsin. So it's up to you to try and help ensure the results on Tuesday are as accurate as possible, at least until those paper ballots are actually hand-counted and confirmed to have been tabulated accurately --- if they ever are.
To that end, here's a few things you can do tomorrow in Wisconsin (and one thing you can do even if you're not in Wisconsin), to help cover at least a few of the bases where computer tabulation systems can either be gamed or might simply malfunction to report inaccurate results...
• Vote on a paper ballot! Despite the fact that they are often mis-tabulated by computers, as noted above, at least it may be possible to count a paper ballot by hand at some point to determine that it has been tabulated accurately. If you vote on a touch-screen voting system, it will be 100% impossible to ever know that any vote cast on such a system was recorded accurately. If your municipality has touch-screens for you to vote on, request politely but firmly to vote on a paper ballot instead!
• Be at the polls with cameras when they close! Election Integrity expert John Washburn, of Fair Elections Wisconsin, advises that voters should go to polling places just before they close in order to oversee the poll closing process and the printing of results from computer tabulators there.
"Show up for the closing of the elections at eight-o'clock. At that point it's an open meeting, turn on the camera," Washburn told us recently. Once polls close, he notes, the proceedings are then an open meeting by the local board of canvassers which may be recorded by cameras and other devices.
Photograph and/or video-tape the results poll tapes that are printed out by the computers, and anything else you can see. You never know when/if that material may come in handy later. Photos of poll tapes won't ensure the computers tabulated the ballots correctly, but they can help deter the possibility of results being changed later by the central tabulator systems or even on Internet election results reporting websites.
"Record what you see," at the polls, Washburn strongly advises. "If you see anything weird, insist that it be put on the Inspector's Report, because if it ain't on the official election report, it didn't happen." (Inspector's Reports can be printed out here, in case you wish to bring one to the polls.)
• Report any problems you witness If you have a problem voting, or see anything that is troubling, document it as best as possible. As mentioned above, try to see that it gets into your local Inspector's Report at the precinct. But then be sure to report it to the WI Government Accountability Board (G.A.B.) at 866-VOTE-WIS and via email at gab@wi.gov. We recommend you also file another report at the independent national voter problem hotline: 866-OUR-VOTE.
• Take screenshots of results at home As results are being reported online throughout the night, use your computer to take screenshots of them. Results have a way of magically flipping at various points in the night. But if that can't be proven, it's difficult to demand an explanation for the anomaly later. Add a date and time-stamp to the filename of the graphic when you save the screenshots while viewing them. Again, you never know when or if they will come in handy later! This is something you do not have to be in Wisconsin to do!
The points above, in case you are wondering, are all non-partisan. If you doubt that, please note that Washburn, a long time trusted Election Integrity colleague of ours is a Republican. Anyone interested in Election integrity, from any or no party at all, can take the steps mentioned above to help try to assure that the candidates announced the winners after tomorrow's elections are the ones that actually received the most votes.
And thanks for your help! And please pass around the link to this article!
Pat Garofalo
AlternetState film subsidies are giving away desperately needed funds to well-heeled movie moguls.
For his work in the Hollywood blockbuster The Avengers, actor Robert Downey Jr. will make somewhere in the ballpark of $50 million. His co-stars Mark Ruffalo, Samuel L. Jackson and Scarlett Johansson are also slated to make millions of dollars each for their respective portrayals of Marvel superheroes.
Of course, paydays that high are much easier for a studio to stomach (in this case Marvel Studios, which is part of the Walt Disney Company) when they come after a film has made more than $1 billion at the global box office, as has The Avengers. But taxpayers should pause when they find out that they covered some of the cost of making the smash hit, sending free money to a huge multinational corporation at a time of economic distress.
The budget for The Avengers was a hefty $220 million, but a portion of it was defrayed by $22 million in subsidies that Marvel received from the state of New Mexico. Much of the film was shot at various locations around Albuquerque, New Mexico, and the state has decided to provide a 25 percent rebate for any film or television production done within its borders.
That New Mexico managed to find $22 million to subsidize a major motion picture should raise some eyebrows, considering that, in the last few years, it has cut funding for services for the elderly and the disabled, preschool, higher education, and its state workforce. “We could have spent that $22 million on all kinds of things, like education for our children. We could have spent it on roads,” said New Mexico state Rep. Dennis Kintigh (R).
New Mexico is far from the only state providing subsidies for film and television production. In 2010, 43 states spent $1.5 billion on film and TV subsidies. Of the nine films that were nominated for best picture in 2012, five received state subsidies, including The Help, Moneyball and The Descendents.
The common rationale used to justify such a cost is that the subsidies attract jobs and other economic activity to a state that otherwise will go somewhere else, benefiting someone else. However, as the Center for Budget and Policy Priorities found, the subsidies only tend to create short-term jobs. Furthermore, those jobs are filled by already well-off film professionals who come from a state other than the one that’s footing the bill:
“State film subsidies are a wasteful, ineffective, and unfair instrument of economic development. While they appear to be a “quick fix” that provides jobs and business to state residents with only a short lag, in reality they benefit mostly non-residents, especially well-paid non-resident film and TV professionals. Some residents benefit from these subsidies, but most end up paying for them in the form of fewer services — such as education, healthcare, and police and fire protection — or higher taxes elsewhere.”
The few analyses done of state film and television subsidies have found that their rate of return in terms of economic activity borders on pathetic. For instance, Rhode Island found that it receives just 28 cents in direct economic investment for every dollar it spends on subsidies. A 2005 study by Louisiana’s chief economist found that the economic activity generated by film subsidies only offsets 16-18 percent of their cost.
Piling on, in 2007, the Connecticut Department of Community and Economic Development found that its state “will not receive enough additional revenue from increased economic activity to pay for the estimated $16.5 million in tax credits” doled out to the film industry. The New England Public Policy Center at the Federal Reserve Bank of Boston added that “film tax credits do not ‘pay for themselves’ by indirectly generating additional corporate income, sales, and property tax revenues.”
Like many subsidies, those for film and television not only wind up lining the pockets of the already well-to-do, but also end up paying for activity for which they were not intended. Case in point, New Jersey lawmakers belatedly found out that that they were subsidizing the production of MTV’s “Jersey Shore,” much to the chagrin of Gov. Chris Christie (R). (The state later canceled that particular subsidy.) Other times, the subsidies will go toward projects that would have happened in a particular state anyway, providing a convenient windfall rather than an enticement for production to move.
Even the film industry’s lobbying arm, the Motion Picture Association of America, can’t find any hard data to support its contention that film subsidies help a state succeed economically. In fact, a recent report by the MPAA in defense of film subsidies cited only a hypothetical $10 million production, not a real film, as evidence that subsidies work.
Fortunately, some states, such as Arizona and Kansas, have ended their subsidy programs, bringing the number of states spending tax dollars on film and television production this year down to 35, according to the conservative Tax Foundation. But other states are doubling down, betting more on the film industry with the economy still struggling in the wake of the Great Recession. That may be a way for Hollywood to get ahead, but it’s doing precious little for those taxpayers who are ultimately providing the dollars.
———————–
Pat Garofalo is economic policy editor for ThinkProgress.org. His writing has also appeared in the Nation, the Atlantic, U.S. News & World Report, and other publications. Follow him on Twitter at @Pat_Garofalo.
FOLLOW SET YOU FREE NEWS:
MOST VIEWED TODAY:
#filmsubsidyfail
This Goes Out To George H. W. Bush. Where Were You In 1976?
(0 rating, 0 votes, rated)
You need to be a registered member to rate this post.Loading ...
June 3, 2012 in Uncategorized
-->You were soliciting me with gaudy adds on glossy flyiers to get my vote. You got my goat instead. I just wanted to be there for the people. I did not ask to be on your mailing list. I was elected then but not you. Did you hate me for that . Is that why you followed my progress? Did you have a plan for me, a secret?
I was there in June in 1976 in Grand Rapids, the city I was born in. Some of us were serious but you seemed to have gotten to many. They just wanted to go to your party. Asking each other who’s party are you going to? Who’s party, what party, I thought we were the party.
I saw you devide the party. You seem good at that. It was a convention and I did not have time to party with you. I realized that I could be compromised. I went outside into the streets and smoked cigs with the homeless. Did you wonder where I was? Did you have a girl for me or a boy if that is what I wanted to party you silly smarty I should hold my tonge because I don’t want to curse anyone. But I am willing to curse you, you beast.
I must hand it to you cause I was so wrong and I admitt that I was sadly mistaken. But I was not wrong,. You were. I was just sadly mistaken. After we shook hands I was certain that I had nothing to worry about because who ever you were I knew the people would never elect you. I knew I would’nt vote for you.
I was certain people would see through you flying in on a chopper that hung up there long enough for the delogates to antisapate some special event. And along came George and Georgy poorgy put in pie to kiss the girls and make them cry. A whole lot of you Bush and more Bush.
So what did you do? You picked me out did you not? You had to get my vote and if you couldn’t you’d get everyone I loved to vote for you because your just not going to loose are you? You kept an eye on me didn’t you? You found out I was a Christian so you had to get the Christian vote and along came your moral majority movment. You Fuck. You don’t love us. I worked for Bectel and you were there. I joined the Marine Corps and you were there. Always in the shadows. Was that you who crept up to my rack and tried to fondle me? Was that you who did nothing to stop and prevent abortions. You are a looser
I could be delusional and only you know. I don;t know. I was not creeping and slouching and slithering and munching on the dead. So I don’t know. Someone was doing it to me and it was not my country or church or family. What was the reason I was arrested so many times? Why was my name bliking on the computer. Why make a big deal about me smoking pot? Now I smoke pot alot.
Are you Ill ? Go for the healing. Something I know about. Guess what? I believe in the human being and you have given me every reason to demonize humans. Your no demon. Your full of It. Are you in a wheel chair yet? I just would just like to know if you did it on your own or did Barbra make you do? Don’t you know anything?
Podcast MP3: http://m.podshow.com/media/15412/episodes/315813/noagenda-315813-06-03-2012.mp3
Support The Show: http://dvorak.org/na
No Agenda News Network: http://noagendanewsnetwork.com/
Podcast Feed: http://mevio.com/feeds/noagenda.xml
No Agenda Newsletter Feed: http://us1.campaign-archive1.com/feed?u=d0e55f3197099944345708652&id=6ccb...
Podcast MP3: http://m.podshow.com/media/15412/episodes/315736/noagenda-315736-05-31-2012.mp3
Support The Show: http://dvorak.org/na
No Agenda News Network: http://noagendanewsnetwork.com/
Podcast Feed: http://mevio.com/feeds/noagenda.xml
No Agenda Newsletter Feed: http://mevio.com/feeds/noagenda.xml
#winloseordrone
Barack Obama: Drone Warrior
By Charles Krauthammer,
A very strange story, that 6,000-word front-page New York Times piece on how, every Tuesday, Barack Obama shuffles “baseball cards” with the pictures and bios of suspected terrorists from around the world and chooses who shall die by drone strike. He even reserves for himself the decision of whether to proceed when the probability of killing family members or bystanders is significant.
The article could have been titled “Barack Obama: Drone Warrior.” Great detail on how Obama personally runs the assassination campaign. On-the-record quotes from the highest officials. This was no leak. This was a White House press release.
Why? To portray Obama as tough guy. And why now? Because in crisis after recent crisis, Obama has looked particularly weak: standing helplessly by as thousands are massacred in Syria; being played by Iran in nuclear negotiations, now reeling with the collapse of the latest round in Baghdad; being treated with contempt by Vladimir Putin, who blocks any action on Syria or Iran and adds personal insult by standing up Obama at the latter’s G-8 and NATO summits.
The Obama camp thought that any political problem with foreign policy would be cured by the Osama bin Laden operation. But the administration’s attempt to politically exploit the raid’s one-year anniversary backfired, earning ridicule and condemnation for its crude appropriation of the heroic acts of others.
A campaign ad had Bill Clinton praising Obama for the courage of ordering the raid because, had it failed and Americans been killed, “the downside would have been horrible for him. “ Outraged vets released a response ad, pointing out that it would have been considerably more horrible for the dead SEALs.
That ad also highlighted the many self-references Obama made in announcing the bin Laden raid: “I can report . . . I directed . . . I met repeatedly . . . I determined . . . at my direction . . . I, as commander in chief,” etc. ad nauseam. (Eisenhower’s announcement of the D-Day invasion made not a single mention of his role, whereas the alternate statement he’d prepared had the landing been repulsed was entirely about it being his failure.)
Obama only compounded the self-aggrandizement problem when he spoke a week later about the military “fighting on my behalf.”
The Osama-slayer card having been vastly overplayed, what to do? A new card: Obama, drone warrior, steely and solitary, delivering death with cool dispatch to the rest of the al-Qaeda depth chart.
So the peacemaker, Nobel laureate, nuclear disarmer, apologizer to the world for America having lost its moral way when it harshly interrogated the very people Obama now kills, has become — just in time for the 2012 campaign — Zeus the Avenger, smiting by lightning strike.
A rather strange ethics. You go around the world preening about how America has turned a new moral page by electing a president profoundly offended by George W. Bush’s belligerence and prisoner maltreatment, and now you’re ostentatiously telling the world that you personally play judge, jury and executioner to unseen combatants of your choosing and whatever innocents happen to be in their company.
This is not to argue against drone attacks. In principle, they are fully justified. No quarter need be given to terrorists who wear civilian clothes, hide among civilians and target civilians indiscriminately. But it is to question the moral amnesia of those whose delicate sensibilities were offended by the Bush methods that kept America safe for a decade — and who now embrace Obama’s campaign of assassination by remote control.
Moreover, there is an acute military problem. Dead terrorists can’t talk.
Drone attacks are cheap — which is good. But the path of least resistance has a cost. It yields no intelligence about terror networks or terror plans.
One capture could potentially make us safer than 10 killings. But because of the moral incoherence of Obama’s war on terror, there are practically no captures anymore. What would be the point? There’s nowhere for the CIA to interrogate. And what would they learn even if they did, Obama having decreed a new regime of kid-gloves, name-rank-and-serial-number interrogation?
This administration came out opposing military tribunals, wanting to try Khalid Sheik Mohammed in New York, reading the Christmas Day bomber his Miranda rights and trying mightily (and unsuccessfully, there being — surprise! — no plausible alternative) to close Guantanamo. Yet alongside this exquisite delicacy about the rights of terrorists is the campaign to kill them in their beds.
You festoon your prisoners with rights — but you take no prisoners. The morality is perverse. Which is why the results are so mixed. We do kill terror operatives, an important part of the war on terror, but we gratuitously forfeit potentially life-saving intelligence.
But that will cost us later. For now, we are to bask in the moral seriousness and cool purpose of our drone warrior president.
Breitbart: Glenn Beck is a Liar, Thief and Coward
Infowars.com
June 2, 2012
Several months before his untimely and suspicious death, Andrew Breitbart called Glenn Beck a lair, thief and a coward. Breitbart made the comments on December 11, 2001, on KABC radio in Los Angeles (see the video below).
Breitbart: Beck is a snake.
He offered the assessment after Beck characterized Newt Gingrich as a “progressive.” In fact, Gingrich is a dyed-in-the-wool big government globalist, although Breitbart did not characterize him as such.
Breitbart also said Beck is a master thief who steals content from other media personalities and regurgitates it for his own financial benefit.
Alex Jones has on numerous occasions accused Beck of lifting his material.
“It’s very, very painful to see this biological android, a complete actor, reading off teleprompters and singing and dancing around and prancing around, a fairy dancing and prancing around, using my material,” Jones told Joe Hagan. “Glenn Beck climbed over my back. He’s like a fiddler crab that grabbed the shell off my back and scurried over me.”
Beck has practically made a cottage industry out pilfering Jones’ material and attacking him.
In an effort to steer attention away from the crimes of the globalists and center attention on Jones, Beck’s The Blaze recently decided to concentrate on attempting to discredit Jones for simply pointing out the fact that the global elite engage in bizarre behavior.
“An article entitled Alex Jones Believes Bilderberg Attendees Ship in Gold-Covered Roasted Babies to Eat written by Madeleine Morgenstern takes a 30 second clip out of the 30-plus hours of live streaming Infowars has done so far and spins it out of context to imply that Jones was literally saying babies were being delivered for Bilderberg members to eat,” writes Paul Joseph Watson.
“In reality, Jones was engaging in a piece of dark satire based on the Johnathan Swift’s satirical essay A Modest Proposal in which he suggests the Irish eat their own babies. The rant about gold-leaf covered babies was based on a factual news story about a British citizen arrested last month in Thailand for attempting to transport dead babies wrapped in gold leaf foil for black magic rituals.”
Glenn Beck specializes in disinformation ops designed to trick his “conservative” followers and lead them into dead-ends and cul-de-sacs that ultimately neutralize the political opposition. As Breitbart notes, he is accumulating a lot of money in the process.
Similar/Related Articles
- Glenn Beck Accused of Stealing Material From Conservative Bloggers
- Glenn Beck Ignores Bilderberg, Attacks Alex Jones
- Glenn Beck goes after Color of Change co-founder Van Jones
- Washington Post Report: Media Matters: Is Glenn Beck the next Alex Jones?
- Glenn Beck’s Big Lie: Will the real Glenn Beck please stand up?
- Glenn Beck’s Shtick? Alex Jones Got There First
- Ron Paul and Glenn Beck, Friends and Foes
- Glenn Beck repackages Alex Jones’ ideas
- Glenn Beck Stars as “V for Viper”
- Glenn Beck Makes It Official: He Will Depart Fox News
- Glenn Beck’s a Libertarian Now
- Kill the Messenger: Glenn Beck Attacks Jesse Ventura as ‘Big, Dumb Bully’
Tags: Domestic News, Entertainment
Share this article:
By Paul Joseph WatsonPresident Barack Obama’s unconstitutional secret ‘kill list’ includes a 17-year-old girl along with several American citizens, according to a New York Times report.
“Mr. Obama has placed himself at the helm of a top secret “nominations” process to designate terrorists for kill or capture, of which the capture part has become largely theoretical. He had vowed to align the fight against Al Qaeda with American values; the chart, introducing people whose deaths he might soon be asked to order, underscored just what a moral and legal conundrum this could be,” reports the NY Times, adding that one of the targets in Yemen is “a girl who looked even younger than her 17 years,” and that “Several were Americans.”
The White House has asserted the right to carry out state-sponsored assassination anywhere in the world without having to provide any evidence or go through any legal process. The administration merely has to state that the target is a terrorist and it doesn’t matter whether they are an American citizen or not, as we saw in the case of American-born Anwar al-Awlaki and his son, who were both killed last year.
In December, Obama administration lawyers reaffirmed their backing for state sponsored assassination, claiming that “U.S. citizens are legitimate military targets” and do not have the right to any legal protection against being marked for summary execution.
During a CBS 60 Minutes interview in January, Secretary of Defense Leon Panetta revealed that Obama himself personally approves the policy to kill American citizens suspected of terrorism without trial on a case by case basis.
“So it’s the requirement of the administration under the current legal understanding that the president has to make that declaration, not you?” Panetta was asked, to which he replied, “That is correct.”
The fact that the administration is carrying out state-sponsored assassination with absolutely no regard to legal due process in the name of fighting Al-Qaeda is particularly brazen given the fact that the US has backed Al-Qaeda terrorists in both Libya and Syria in the effort to overthrow Colonel Gaddafi and Bashar Al-Assad.
“In the USA, it is illegal to impose executions on people under 18, something that most Democrats would support, I suppose. Yet, their vaunted president, Barack Obama, has declared that a 17-year-old girl is to be gunned down if American spies can find her,” writes Bill Anderson.
“Somehow, I doubt that there will be a peep of protest about that at the Democratic National Convention this summer. And, to make things even more depressing, I’m sure that the Republicans will claim that Obama is “soft on terrorism” and is too “timid” to launch the U.S. Killing Machine in full force. So it has come to this: Washington, D.C., is the new home of Murder, Inc.”
Given that spy drones used to hunt down insurgents in Afghanistan and Iraq are now not only being deployed domestically but also armed with non-lethal weapons, how long before such technology is used to assassinate American citizens on U.S. soil based on the mere claim that the target is a terrorist?
Article Posted: 6 minutes ago
Infowars.com
May 30, 2012
Globalist kingpin David Rockefeller and top bankster Lord Jacob Rothschild will merge operations, according to the Financial Times:
RIT Capital Partners is to buy a 37 per cent stake in the Rockefeller’s wealth advisory and asset management group for an undisclosed sum, giving Lord Rothschild’s London-listed trust a much sought-after foothold in the US.
RIT Capital Partners will concentrate “on setting up investment funds, eyeing joint acquisitions of wealth and asset managers and granting each other non-executive directorships.”
The deal was agreed upon two years ago when Rockefeller introduced Rothschild to Reuben Jeffrey, the CEO of Rockefeller & Co, and a former United States Under Secretary of State for Economic, Business, and Agricultural Affairs, having been appointed to that position by Bush in June 2007, ans also sat on the National Security Council. He enter the revolving door between government and business after working at Goldman Sachs.
Tags: Domestic News, Financial
Sponsored Link: Interested in a $0 electrical bill? Click here to get a free solar assessment from pre-certified installers in your area!
If the dollar crashes what is left is mining and resources, does it means that money junkies like J.P. Morgan will be losing some of their status in the Rothschild Empire, or is it merely a day when Zionist monopoly can expand further without government over-sight or care. And how about Rockefeller interests in Japan and the Korean Mob. Is it not also a consolidation of the Jewish criminal network. Do the Elders of Zion feel challenged by the elders of orient. The true service of a Druid is to keep an Eye on these middle-men. Don’t forsake the oak for the yew, both these trees of man are important, no matter how much ingratitude they express, nor should one become like them — the Anubis will weigh your heart against a feather.
Are these two bitches going to get married at the Marriott this weekend?
Does this mean that the Rothschild family has lost confidence in David Rockefeller Jr. and his ability to run the family empire? Are we making a dent? Have we succeeded to some extent in hurting the Rockefeller family?
Pray curses and death to these two bastards.
We should never ask for death for anyone who is as lost as these two. We should pray for them to repent and change before it is too late. I only hope that they change their money loving ways and see the truth before they are cast into the pit of hell. I wish that on no one.
I am amazed at as old as these two are, they are so concerned about money. You would think that they would realize that nobody ever takes a U-haul to the cemetery. They came into this world with nothing and will leave with nothing. If they die before you or I, we will be wealthier than they after they are gone.
Knowing what we know about these two, it seems they will never repent and will spend eternity in the lake of fire. It is a shame for all the money they have could have been used for the good of all. Instead they used their money to bring about suffering and death.
A well managed family line can accumulate wealth and privilege. But a religion with a devoted following will last thousands of years and can vie for the control of the planet.
But Races created religions and sometimes civilizations.
Maybe they have all the money, maybe not. PIMCO and Blackrock to name but two. Also, these old men would not do well addressing officers at West Point. a lot of dead Gulf War veterans, and then there is the deaths of Vietnam veterans the media never touches. I’m just a bird hunting for seeds, but I will tell you (never forget Cicero) they THINK they control, but they don’t. Y’all think everyone can be bought. Key word is “think” … you’d be wrong. If that were true, there would not be any clergy in this world. We control Piketon, not Rothchild not Rockefeller. Sad to be them too. You need to ask yourselves, when is the last time they had sex with a woman genuinely attracted to them? I’m pretty sure the chicks were thinking about someone like Brad Pitt, not them. They know this too. Wish them luck taking the gold with them when they die.
and before you totally curse every person in the world with money, remember that should you win the lottery. This ire you read here, well it could be against you in the not so distant future. What would you do? You won $400 million, and now you are the villain, but yesterday, you were the hero when you had $2000 in the bank. Now that you’ve won money, are you supposed to give it away to every ass with their hands out? No. You’d do what they do and run and hide and live in a gated village, that’s what you’d do. Maybe 5 on this whole board would be charitable. Maybe 5. I doubt it. Hypocrites.
thou shalt not covet thy neighbors property
You`re not going to win the lottery. Read 1984.
I work for Rothschild. Money will never be an issue for me. I don’t have much use for materialistic things. And if you believe that, I’ll sell you a beach in Arizona. Great waves they say. Hammer, what IS true is the UFO above me near Piketon. You cannot see it, for it is cloaked in an invisibility shield. It works this way, what the UFO is blocking above it to those on the ground (the sky) is simply mirrored onto the bottom of the craft. Humanity has no radar for which to identify this either. I was visited in 1989 and also in 2004. Whatever you animals do to earth you will do. I’m on their ship when all is lost, so I don’t care. But maybe reason will prevail? We’ll see. You just mocked one of the ten commandments. Not sure you satanists will ever repent.
It looks as if these people, having been found out, are now playing a game. A game to the death. OURS.
Hitler’s grandmother was a Rothchild. Also, Rothchild is related to Rockefeller. I wonder why Rockefeller needs to sell anything to Rothchild, maybe he’s getting broke from destroying us and his money is drying up.
DON’T THESE GUYS JUST LOOK LIKE FAILURES??????
But then;
SATAN WAS A FAILURE ALL ALONG.
Do you recognize Satan as a failure?
They were born to fail.
AS YOU ENTER THE KILLING FIELDS – REALISE THIS …
The fields are your success.
They hate fields.
They want the city.
LOCK & LOAD AMERICA – YOU’RE GOING TO WAR AGAINST ABSOLUTE FAILURES.
Make sure my posse takes command of the fields.
Rothschild has half to three quarter the WORLDS WEALTH, I imagine Rockerfeller is second, put it together and what does it spell, WORLD DOMINATION.
One would do well to look at the list of familys that first colonized the America’s. Rothschild,Rockefeller,Dupont,Li.Kennedy,Onasis ,Reynolds, all kissing couisins and related to the Rottenchild’s.The 13 familys represented by the 13 stripes on the freemason flag of America.
Don’t forget the Collins family!
I think it is time for main street American people to form a counter government whereby we the people make a list of those we have determined are destroying America and are therefore absolute enemies who have committed treason and high crimes and just as Obama has done – to protect this country – target and assassinate these enemies of Americans – substitute due process with action – be jury & judge and executioner just like Obama…………..of course Rockefeller & Rothschild would be in the top ten most wanted dead or alive(not really)………………….frontier justice by the people………..
Rockefeller made a deal with Rothchild`, Lucifer`s main man, for the new body he`s going to take over before his old, putrid, carcass finally dies. That`s the way they`ve been doing it for centuries.
That is the scariest picture of David Rockefeller I have ever seen. AHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHH
“Globalists” thats cute.
I think a much more descriptive term would be Zionist.
Sure, they have always pushed for a global goverment, but thats only part of it.
The rabbit hole runs deep. Learn about it and oppose it like many will.
Peace.
i have wanted to learn more about so called “Zionists” and what they are all about. Can you please point me to some websites, links or literature? That would be awesome and i thank you in advance. I am like a sponge for knowledge.
Read “The Controversy of Zion” by Douglass Reed. It`s over 600 pages and will explain the whole thing and you will then be enlightened to all that is happening today. It was published in 1956 and is more important today.
I’ve never read the book, but a lot of times, you can find these books for free on the ‘net.
-http://www.kasjo.net/reeedcontrov.pdf
Here’s another one. There are dozens. Good luck.
-http://www.whale.to/c/Behind-Communism-by-Frank-L.-Britton.pdf
The trouble with this subject is that everyone has been programmed not to look at it. And if you start finding things out, you begin to feel guilty about your conclusions. And then, if you don’t live in a country where freedom of speech is pretty well entrenched, you go to prison for saying anything.
Zionism is an ideology that essentially preaches racial superiority. Modern Day Zionism is a skewed version of the original spirituality behind zionism. Original zionism was zimply jews having their own homeland and it being by mount zion (jerusalem). Today’s Zionism was co-opted by this despotic world plutocracy and (along with christianity and Islam) made into a fanatical racist chest beating ideology filled with hate. Google image: “Einstein Letter ZIonism”. Thats a good start. THen read the protocols of zion (or listen to full version in YT).
Learn about the Talmud and how its a arbitrary interpretation of the TOrah by many rabbi’s (the torah which itself is just another bunch of men writing about a guy they heard of who knew a guy who got stoned and saw a burning bush)! Learn about United Nations General Assembly Resolution 3379 which was passed and confirms that Zionism is a form of racism.
Israel today is not the Israel of old. Any God fearing Jewish man can tell you this. Yahweh would not be happy to see what is happening today. Israel today was financed by central bankers like Rothschild, Prescott Bush, etc. The largest boulevard in Tel Aviv is Rothschild. I could go on and on but Israel is just a military fort in the middle east financed by godless bankers who hid behind the convenient neurosis called Religion.
Wake the Flock up.
Google: The Lavon Affair, USS Liberty, The Apollo Affair, Israel selling illegal nuclear weapons to South Africa , Patriot missiles to China, Jonathan Pollard, etc. Crazy.
Youtube: WAR BY DECEPTION by ryan dawson
Yikes… Rockefeller, Rothschild, Gates, Turner and whoever else… These guys remind me of “The Big 5″ from that cartoon YuGiOh a long time ago xD Yeah I know, I’m not a fan of that cartoon however I did watch it.
They were executives for Kiba Corp (creating WMD’s). Even cartoons will give ya hints how sick these guys are.
NEPHILIM is absolutely correct, they are 2 of Satan’s children; if a ever could imagine the Princes of Hell, it would look like them.
What really sucks is to see that those old Billionares criminals keep getting older and uglier everyday…but they don’t die !
…the best meds money can buy.
Yes, that is now on the top of my “TO DO LIST,” pray for their immediate deaths!
They’re human/demon hybrids anyway.
Another Nephilim demon spirit inhabitting a human body. That’s all this band of filth is!
but they will eventually, and the death after this life, hell if you will, is worth than death itself. Imagine the life of a rock compared to the life of a human being. A soul in hell is the rock, and the soul in heaven’s life is like that of a human being compared to a rock. So let them keep on sinning, we, the righteous, will win in the end, in this life, and in the next! PEACE
the above post is in response to Charlie Chill and die they will!!!
These guys look like they have some kind of genetic mutation due to inbreeding. They have that whole, “I hate humanity and good people” look on their faces…
And as the pieces are placed in position soon it’ll be CHECKMATE.
No, not true.
…the game will have just been realized, and THEN will really begin being played.
Much different, ‘they’ will see, than their expectations.
Expectations are the biggest let down in the human idea of things.
…they never go along with the actual plan…
A Canadian company for whom I worked, fell on hard times and was forced to borrow from the Rothchild Bank. Terms were demanding and expensive, but it saved our company from bankrupcy. There were no other lenders on Bay Street who would help us.
Us, ? -your still with them then ?
-or just in team spirit ?
Demanding and expensive of course. When you borrow from the mafia that’s what you get.
Undisclosed sum = 6 young boys and a jar of pickeled babys imported from China.